Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Zimmerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 11:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Zimmerman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

County-level judge who fails WP:GNG and WP:JUDGE. GPL93 (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources I have just added to the article. Zimmerman may not pass WP:JUDGE, but he seems to pass WP:GNG. Gilded Snail (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I am not sure this meets GNG. All judges make rulings. There are not really stories focussed on his biographical history. The story about refusing to work in unsafe conditions is probably a WP:BLP1E.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Run-of-the-mill local judge, does not meet WP:GNG, even with references added since the AFD began. It's simple news coverage of cases where he presided, which is exactly what you'd get with a RotM judge; and he complained about lack of security in the courts, leading him to be reassigned to another court. No notability here. TJRC (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the subject seems to lack notability. I can circle back to see if anything gets GNG'd Lubbad85 (☎) 21:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.