Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Klein
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. per G12, copyright violation from http://www.alionthego.com/blogs/7_Questions/page/2 JForget 21:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note
this article was vandalized, it was initially from a hockey player but was completely replaced by the copyright violation from a tottally unrelated subject. However, it was only redirect to Dede Klein before the change, so it will be reverted to the redirect version --JForget 21:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lloyd Klein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
autobio vanity spam WuhWuzDat 19:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
okay honestly everyone needs to slow down i just put this up yesterday and was just told about the problem YESTERDAY. i am working on fixing it RIGHT NOW. so i would appreciate it if you wouldn't delete it while I am in the process of fixing it. THANKS!!!!!
Johnarguelles (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)— Johnarguelles (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Question, how could you have been told about this AfD yesterday, when it was only posted about 22 minutes ago? WuhWuzDat 19:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @924 · 21:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the article looked highly promotional to me. On further investigation, it is copied from a couple of sources (see article talk). As of this note, the article has been listed as a suspected copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.