Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Freeman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus reached. (non-admin closure) Timothytyy (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie Freeman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability, a very short entry on Behind the Voice Actors (kind of an IMDb for voice actors: while reliable, it doesn't add to notability, per WP/RSP) and otherwise only passing mentions: it looks as if no reliable sources have given significant attention to her. Fram (talk) 10:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Oklahoma. Fram (talk) 10:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As I mentioned when I removed the PROD, she meets criterion #1 of WP:NACTOR as having multiple main roles in notable works. In some of these, such as Lycoris Recoil, Rent-A-Girlfriend, and Magical Sempai, she voices the the protagonist or main female lead. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seconded. With enough work, Freeman's article can look respectable. Leader Vladimir (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the English translations, for which she barely received any attention. Hardly indicative of being a significant role (as described in NACTOR) if e.g. for Lycoris Recoil, this is the source, and not much better can be found. Fram (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There's enough coverage in third-party sources. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Such as...? Fram (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I agree with other editors that there's probably enough coverage here and the person probably meets notability guidelines. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.