Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live in the Studio 1979
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Live in the Studio 1979
- Live in the Studio 1979 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
wasn't able to establish this as Wikipedia-notable outside of an AllMusic article. Lachlan Foley 03:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not sure why we'd single out Bauhaus album articles for deletion. Bauhaus is clearly a Notable band. Isn't it standard practice to give all of a Notable band's albums their own article? What am I missing? Listmeister (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum: After I wrote the above, I saw the WP:NALBUM policy, which says "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." So, I was wrong about this and the other three Bauhaus recordings AfD'ed today. Still think we should keep the articles though, for the sake of consistency. Listmeister (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 21:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.