Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live... In The Still Of The Night
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 19:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Live... In The Still Of The Night (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced article about a music compilation, fails WP:NALBUMS. Does not seem to be notable on its own. - MrX 20:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Though not properly sourced, the article IS sourcable.
To best serve our readers, we might consider a Merge and Redirect to Whitesnake.(STRUCK)Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and fix per sources offered by User:Michig. I have just tagged the article for editorial attention. What can be fixed does not require deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MJ94 (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is an official DVD from a notable band that has received significant coverage (e.g. [1], [2] and the Music Week article that the above Google search shows). We should therefore keep and expand it. --Michig (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:06, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.