Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Huan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 03:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liu Huan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; NN Chinese artist, hard to determine G-hits w/Chinese characters. SkierRMH 05:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep. Please see References section of article, source that is already there verifies that he meets WP:MUSIC Musicians criteria 10, at the very least. Also has released 20+ CDs with major labels. [1] cab 06:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. MER-C 06:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:MUSIC criteria. Notable artist from China, sources have been cited also. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 08:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - I hate the MyWikiSpacePedia phenomenon as much as the next guy and more than the one after him, but this musician remained at number one for ten weeks in a country of 1.3 billion people. It needs a clean up sure, but this is not non notable. •Elomis• 11:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He's a bona fides star in China. scope_creep 14:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Google is not research (a non-fully researched google search more so). He definitely satsfies WP:MUSIC as well, having a top-seller in China, plenty of music with major labels, and The baidu news page for him is extensive (though I'm not sure how reliable the news sources are). ColourBurst 01:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I hope the excerpt "His song ... remained in the number one position for ten weeks on mainland China radio" is self explanatory. RFerreira 06:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.