Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Monsters (social network)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Lady Gaga. MBisanz talk 00:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Little Monsters (social network)
- Little Monsters (social network) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable social networking site owned by American singer Lady Gaga. — ṞṈ™ 21:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep or Merge. A website such as this is partially notable, but the article needs a lot of work. It is missing references. This could possibly be merged into the Lady Gaga article or into the list of Social Networks (which it may already be a part of). LogicalCreator (talk) 07:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge probably It's got quite a bit of press coverage[1][2][3][4] but it's only really notable because of the Gaga connection, and the media coverage doesn't contain much detail. I can see some people might argue keep, but there's not much to keep just now. --Colapeninsula (talk) 22:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I'm seeing buckets and loads of secondary source coverage from all over the place. — Cirt (talk) 22:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge (with Lady Gaga) or Keep - likely to be significant coverage, but may not be relevant outside of Gaga. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Lady Gaga. All the secondary coverage I'm seeing is primarily about the Lady Gaga rather than the site. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.