Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Einsteins Preschool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Little Einsteins Preschool

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, references do not establish pass of WP:GNG. Lack of reliable resources. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

comment The India.com and India Today articles are the same from Press Trust of India and another source is from Business Line. That's two pretty solid sources with 30 seconds of checking. This feels like WP:BEFORE was discarded and tossed aside without a care. Ravensfire (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India.com is a press release and Businessline is an announcement. Priyanjali singh (talk) 11:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the above comment, the links show robusity and notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ravensfire, you can be sure that the user tossed out WP:BEFORE hard before nominating. They nominated 10 articles for Afd within exactly 25 minutes. I think they did it believing that the creator of all 10 articles (same person) had accepted undisclosed payments for them. Roller26 (talk) 11:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:NSCHOOL. The sources mentioned above are routine announcements in PTI which was carried by a number of newspapers. It does not in anyway convey significant coverage. Looking at all the sources and news reports, I could only come up with these which need attention. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. All these contain very PROMO material with huge chunks being just interviews with the organization executives. Hence huge question of independent coverage is there. A number of them being trade journals would hardly qualify as reliable source. The requirement for notability for private organizations is pretty high and I don't think they have significant coverage in even one independent RS let also multiple to establish notability. Roller26 (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per analysis of the sources by Roller26 - thank you for that. Had the OP included this analysis at the start, this would have been pretty slam dunk. Agree with you on the sources, several of them are obviously press-release journalism pulled from the same release, there's an couple of interview's which don't help. This looked interesting, but it's about a specific franchise, not the company in general. Same here from a google news search. Just not enough sources there for NCORP or GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.