Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of types of clothing
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of types of clothing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There is already a category Category:Types of clothing that has all these entries (I checked) and is much better organized and more comprehensive. Since there's really no commentary for the list, it's not adding anything. Calliopejen 07:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - although the nominator's rationale makes sense (and generally I prefer categories to lists), I can't see a compelling policy argument for deleting it. It isn't inherently an indiscriminate or non-encyclopedic subject for a list, so it doesn't fall under WP:NOT. However, it does need rewriting with more commentary, and the criteria for inclusion need to be clarified. Walton Vivat Regina! 10:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is more of an index than an encyclopedia entry, and contains almost nothing that isn't already in a category. Agent 86 20:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as something that is better handled by a category. --Dennisthe2 22:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, redundant to category. - PKM 06:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sort them by categories less space easy better. Artaxiad 21:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.