Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political parties in Vietnam
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- List of political parties in Vietnam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is only one party in Vietnam, the Communist Party of Vietnam. Vietnam is a one-party state. Secondly, none of these parties are strong in mainland Vietnam itself; they all exist outside of Vietnam. This article is superfluous; its waste. Another problem is that of expansion; there is only one party; literature on the other parties are scarce... My last point is that this information can easily be merged into the Vietnamese democracy movement.. Even so DELETE :) --TIAYN (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Valid, useful list including multiple bluelinks, also part of comprehensive list structure for List of political parties by United Nations geoscheme. --19:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arxiloxos (talk • contribs)
- Keep per Arxiloxos, and because it satisfies WP:LISTPURP as a navigational index of articles relevant to a notable topic, which is complementary to Category:Political parties in Vietnam per WP:CLN. The nom's criticisms are all irrelevant; it doesn't matter that there is only one legal party, it doesn't matter that "none of these parties are strong in mainland Vietnam itself" (obviously a consequence of their being outlawed); and it doesn't matter that "literature on the other parties are scarce" if they are nevertheless notable, an issue that should be addressed if it's a problem in each article on the individual parties rather than this list. postdlf (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - No valid rationale for deletion has been stated, per the section WP:DEL-REASON of Wikipedia's deletion policy. Despite Vietnam being a one-party state, other parties do exist, and it's honest to present this factual information to Wikipedia's readers. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Also, not "all" of the parties exist/existed outside of Vietnam as stated in the nomination. See Vietnam Populist Party and Democratic Party of Vietnam for starters. I propose that the article is retitled as: List of Vietnamese political parties (which currently redirects to the article). Northamerica1000(talk) 04:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Encyclopedic and useful navigational list. Carrite (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Carrite. Entirely reasonable list of notable subjects. This is what lists are for, regardless of the current political limitations in Vietnam. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 20:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.