Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one songs on American Top 40 of 2004

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one songs on American Top 40 of 2004

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Unsourced lists that come from a radio program with unsourced and questionable methodology. Even the American Top 40 article says AT40 "began using an unpublished chart on a weekly basis for the first time in its history" beginning in October 2000. The chart seemed to be a variant of the CHR/Pop chart provided by Mediabase". Even the Mediabase Top 40 published in USAToday seems to differ from however this list is compiled. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep can easily be sourced at Select Category section of there page. As for methodology not realy relevant as its a list from THERE POV to begin with and is y they have there own charts. The article is not about the reliability of there charts - its just there chart as appose to many others. Moxy (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure who they are, but how does that make it any different than a Radio Disney or an MTV video countdown then? I see no significance of reaching number one on this chart. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable information; no reason to keep chart info related to a chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: unsourced and unverifiable lists. JacksOrion (talk) 10:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.