Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of limited service World War II combat vehicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of limited service World War II combat vehicles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear scope. It's completely unsourced and the idea of "limited service" seems to be entirely subjective, and of little historical value. Some of these were rare because they were extemely specialised, and yet there was no shortage of all those needed. Others were of clear value and in demand, yet unavailable when needed. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A whole heaping helping of stinky OR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Puddleglum2.0 ^{Have a talk?} 20:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, extraordinary that it has survived this long. Cavalryman (talk) 19:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete fails Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists, given the unclear scope --DannyS712 (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:LISTCRITERIA: selection criteria... should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources. Per nom, the notion of "limited service" is entirely subjective, and there is no clear-cut rationale for inclusion in the list. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.