Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional video games
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 02:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of fictional video games
- List of fictional video games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unsourced trivial information. There was a prod on about a week ago, but it was removed for no reason. Also according to the log:[1], it was deleted in the past, because it was a redirect for a deleted page. The deleted page had similar content as this one if I remember right. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. D.M.N. (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced and unimportant, as almost all games are fictional. Malinaccier (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a notable topic --T-rex 00:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Chris! ct 03:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is an unencyclopedic list. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Recreation of previously deleted material with no indication given that the problems during the last AFD have been resolved, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional electronic games (2nd nomination). Someone another (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not only trivial and unencyclopedic, it is also arbitrary and unmanangable. I am sure that loads of fictional computer games have been invented for dramatic and comedic purposes and only an arbitrary few are listed. If all were included it would be unmanagable. --DanielRigal (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.