Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 15:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same case as List of fictional films. Too broad of a list full of things that are not notable. JDDJS (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The list has value for navigation and is notable per WP:LISTN - see here, for example. Andrew (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain. A long list of non-notable fictional games, it is of little use to the reader. However it allows new editors to learn how to make contributions, in a way that does no harm. Maproom (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lists of this sort are useful for the reader in finding related topics, and in finding interesting novels, and providing context. Some of these are significant elements in major works. DGG ( talk ) 02:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is per above. JJ98 (Talk) 10:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stubify might constitute an example farm. 108.216.20.135 (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.