Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional brands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional brands

I really don't see how this is useful, at ALL. WP:LIST ~ G1ggy! _{Reply | Powderfinger!} 09:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:LIST doesn't give any rationale on whether or not this list should be deleted. However, this type of list could never be completed, especially when you realize that notable fictional material is being created on a constant basis where script authors can create a new brand on the fly. It's also appears to be missing content from an entire media of fiction (e.g. video and computer games, such as from Deus Ex.) --Sigma 7 10:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I think WP:LC would be a better link. What I referred to was that WP:LIST explains what should be done re: lists, and this certainly doesn't fall under any of that, IMO. ~ G1ggy! _{Reply | Powderfinger!} 10:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:LC. --Sigma 7 10:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft and I can't see how it could be useful to anyone. Hut 8.5 11:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR. Too incomplete unless you get every mad magazine ever printed for starters. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 19:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I took a look at the article, and thought that it had definite use as a guide to popular culture, satire, and even sociology. Needs expansion and elaboration, though. Rhinoracer 20:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - indiscriminate list and a directory of loosely-assoicated topics, in violation of WP:NOT. Tries to gather every reference to any fictional brand with no regard to whether there is any actual importance to its existence or not. See similar AFDs for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional foods and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional beverages for two similar indiscriminate, unmaintainable lists that were deleted. Otto4711 06:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No vote --Infrangible 19:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is un-maintainable and I cannot see how it would ever be useful as an encylopedia article. Slavlin 21:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.