Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by renewable electricity production
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 12:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of countries by renewable electricity production (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Useless as so old. Anyone geeky enough to extract new data from IRENA would load it on Wikidata not here, as Wikipedia is not really designed for lots of numbers. But even if they did load it to Wikidata and then extracted to other language Wikipedias it would be hard to extract to English Wikipedia as Wikidata list is only available for sandboxes on this language. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and improve: Meets the general criteria for a list (e.g., WP:NLIST) and there are reliable sources out there that can be used to update and improve it such as here: [1]. Deletion is not cleanup, and the fact no one bothered to update it is not a reason to delete it. Why? I Ask (talk) 22:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs improvement, not deletion. WP:ATD CT55555(talk) 01:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - an article cannot be deleted to requiring improvment and updating --- Tbf69 userpage • usertalk 11:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Notable topic. No need for deletion. Orientls (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per the above comments - above comment which should be improved, not deleted. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This is exactly the sort of energy law article that we, and our core readership of students, need. Obviously, it needs improvement, as it borders on synthesis. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. NYC Guru (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.