Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cannabis strains

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Cannabis sativa. The edit history remains intact if someone actually wants to weed (sic) through the list, but absent reliable sources I don't see anything for me to move into the target article. ~ trialsanderrors 10:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of cannabis strains

WP:NOT 1.3, 1.7, 1.8. No WP:RS given, and content mostly unverifable. Might be salvageable if some threshold of notability could be established, and WP:V strictly enforced. Chondrite 00:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut down, clean up, and merge into Cannabis sativa.--TBCΦtalk? 00:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the creator of this article, I agree that it should now be deleted. I had hoped that content added to the article would somehow prove verifiable. Unfortunately, the article has recently been overrun by unsourcable material, and I now support its deletion. - R_Lee_E (talk, contribs) 03:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unverifiable.--Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs 03:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Cannabis sativa (if possible), else Delete. --Black-Velvet 05:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any appopriate content to Cannabis sativa. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 06:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Cannabis sativa †he Bread 06:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mergeinto cannabis sativa.CraigMonroe 14:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
sm into Cannabis sativa unless content can be verified. ¿ςפקι Д Иτς! ☺ ☻ 18:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the most popular strains into Cannabis smoking in regard to "name branding" of cannabis. --Howrealisreal 21:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge — into cannabis sativa if possible. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 22:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per TBC.--^ॐ S e adog ^ॐ 23:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into cannabis. Atlantis Hawk 00:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (by nominator) The votes for merge do not address what content in the nominated article is to be merged. Since the nominated article contains no verified information, a merge would consist of a pageblank/redirect at the nominated article, and possibly creating an empty stub section at at the merged-to article. It is not clear why this is preferable to deletion. Chondrite 16:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all content into cannabis but do not delete without merging, anything unverified could then be dealt with at cannabis. i would say merge into cannabis sativa but think that should itself be merged into cannabis and will review whether cannabis sativa needs an afd as well, SqueakBox 18:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete any verifyable information on this topic can be recreated from reliable sources in the appropriate article rather than taken from this article which is completely unverified and lists many stains of dubious notability (assuming they all exist). Eluchil404 10:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.