Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bishonen characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of bishonen characters

This is list that is entirely original research; there are no sources to back up the loooong list of POV claims. (And, no, random people on the Internet are not acceptable as sources, we need confirmation from people who have an actual involvement with those characters, which is exceptionally unlikely. A POV that's shared by some guy with a website is still a POV.) I have deleted a similar list from bishōnen under the same reasoning. ' 06:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced and POV. TJ Spyke 06:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of WP:POV, WP:OR, WP:ATT to name just a few ... Arkyan 15:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete indescriminate list, original research, inherent point of view, etc. Koweja 01:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 01:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For obvious reasons, as above.MightyAtom 03:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as reasons stated above, bishōnen from what I see is to broad a term to have any sort of list. Da Big Bozz 21:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Very broad/vague term thats unsuitable for a list. Wickethewok 22:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons self-evident. JuJube 02:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.