Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of advice podcasts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. which is influenced by the nominator now arguing to Keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of advice podcasts

List of advice podcasts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST, providing functionally little additional information to readers than Category:Advice podcasts. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A grouping not discussed together. Fails WP:LISTN. Let'srun (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because having a list and a category for the same topic is WP:NOTDUP. The subject passes WP:NLIST because it has been discussed as a group or set in reliable sources. For instance, there are sources available in The New York Times, The Guardian, The Columbus Dispatch, Lifehacker, The New Yorker, Bustle, Stylist, Ames Tribune, and Brit.co. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: As stated the existence of the list is fine under WP:NOTDUP but having any more information at all would seriously benefit this page. Reconrabbit 18:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Reconrabbit: the list is definitely lacking in its current state, however, AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and article content does not determine notability. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: per TipsyElephant. DrowssapSMM 14:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (nominator !vote change): Moving to Keep per subsequent discussion. Revisiting the topic now, I worry that my nomination prematurely rejected WP:NLIST, and while I'm still concerned that there is functionally no improvement on the category listing, and I'm not sure how helpful this article will ever be to readers, AfD is not clean-up, as the discussion has noted. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I agree with TipsyElehant. Keep so someone can write the general discussion / comparisons etc. Hym3242 (talk) 21:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.