Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zimbabwe Test cricket records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Zimbabwe Test cricket records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. Has limited value and is out-of-date. If not being maintained, it is pointless it being here. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:OUTDATED seems to be a poor policy argument for deletion. JMWt (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. Not at all, though it is a secondary point here. Note that the main reson is WP:NOTSTATS. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - part of a series of articles of country cricket records - e.g. List of Australia Test cricket records. St Anselm (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - records of a Test playing nation are notable. All batting and bowling records were up to date at time of nomination. Article certainly needs to be more comprehensive but that can be improved over time (the article has only been in existence for a year). Jevansen (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Part of a series, as StAnselm noted, and merging back to the main Zimbabwe national cricket team article would make that article too big. IgnorantArmies (talk) 07:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Request withdrawn by nom. Action taken by StAnselm to correct categorisation errors. I agree that in in the context of its appropriate category, the result should be keep. Jack | ^{talk page} 07:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a subset of the article List of Test cricket records focusing on one of the ten Test nations. The main article is a featured list, and with a lot of work, this could one day get there too. 09:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.