Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tiger Woods' lovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No. No no no no no. Unverifiable, BLP landmine, POV fork, unencyclopedic, I could go on. If you do object to the early closure, please feel free to contact me, but common sense is telling me that we're just wasting time discussing this. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 08:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tiger Woods' lovers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unnecessary fork from Tiger Woods#Personal information, and virtually guaranteed to fill up with potentially libelous negative BLP. A borderline attack page, from the very title "lovers." I thought something like this had already been deleted, though I can't find it. Seems like a terrible idea (no offense to the author). Glenfarclas (talk) 08:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt Will never have any sources that are considered reliable, aren't paid, or actually have anything serious to say. Lock this mess up and leave it to the US Weeklys and RadarOnlines of the world. Nate • (chatter) 08:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the topic of the unwanted public attention towards the private life of a living person is inherently tabloid material and could not conceivably meet the scope of a general interest encyclopaedia. Skomorokh 08:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.