Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Skibidi Toilet episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Skibidi Toilet episodes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article seems to have had numerous issues when created and nonsense text, little sources have been found and I question whether the article's topic is even notable. TwinBoo (talk) 12:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is just a list of non-notable youtube videos (while Skibidi Toilet is of itself notable, none of the videos have individually received any significant coverage yet with the possible exception of the first one). In addition, while the descriptions are actually mostly accurate by my recollection, they should not really be here. If one wanted to do a "plot summary", they should put it into the main article Skibidi Toilet. Possibly consider Redirect as an option.Spiralwidget (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense Babysharkboss2 was here!! ^{Dr. Wu is NOT a Doctor!} 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
bab shakkk do do do do do do do do Aaron Liu (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what? Babysharkboss2 was here!! ^{Dr. Wu is NOT a Doctor!} 23:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's funny how your !vote is just nonsense when your signature is, well... Aaron Liu (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both of you need to stop. Constructive comments only. (That includes writing a real rationale with your !vote.) Sergecross73 msg me 00:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, per WP:NLIST, the individual elements in a list don't need to show notability, if the overall topic is notable. Yes the article needs works, yes more content can be split out the other article - but if the series itself is notable, there's no reason why a list can't exist for reasons of notability. there's sources in the main article that can be used to verify this (and I'll move some across later), but "not notable" doesn't apply to lists like this. Mdann52 (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How exactly does it meet NLIST though? You comment doesn't explain, and notability isn't inherited. Sergecross73 msg me 00:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sergecross73: because per NLIST, a list is presumed notable if the grouping of items is notable. It's undeniable here that the episodes, as taken as a group, meet the relevant notability guidelines, so the list does not need to show the items are independently notable. The series is notable, the episodes don't have to show notability for the list to exist. Mdann52 (talk) 06:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't proven the grouping of episodes is notable though. That isn't automatic just because the subject is notable. I'll drop it, as it appears you've already dropped it below, but for future reference, it takes more than the subject being notable to rightfully invoke NLIST... Sergecross73 msg me 14:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to delete as per Belbury. Mdann52 (talk) 06:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Entertainment, Internet, Lists, and Georgia (country). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a ridiculous "article" that only belongs on Wikidata. Nothing of value will be lost in deletion. Assimilate them as a summary like "episodes are titled by their number" and confine this otherworldly prattle to its rightful place. Everybody, it's time to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. We are responsible for our future generations and the lifeblood of this country.^[Joke] Aaron Liu (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the article has changed a bit—its state before nomination included one-sentence descriptions and "*top rated*" on certain episodes as well. Aaron Liu (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NOTDATABASE. Without any actual descriptions, this is just an indiscriminate list of dates and episodes. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources to do not support documenting this topic in this level of detail. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that this article was created by LTA hoaxer User:Oatsandcream evading a block, a few days ago, I don't know how much it's been reworked since. --Belbury (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that case... Delete even though I'm the only other major contributor. Mdann52 (talk) 06:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Despite the baseless assertion above, this article does not in fact meet NLIST...or anything else notability-wise. Even if it did, its virtually devoid of encyclopedic content. Best case scenario would be a WP:TNT delete. Sergecross73 msg me 17:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Honestly, these episodes aren't even notable enough to be listed in the Skibidi Toilet article. —theMainLogan (t•c) 17:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, since there is not that much substance to Skibidi Toilet (this article feels unfinished too) to warrant a list of its episodes. They are quite short, so explaining their whole plots would probably attract sentences as long as typical Wikipedia TV show episode summaries. If needed, its whole plot could instead be explained in prose as a giant section, granted that said section is supported by reliable secondary sources. But if you need a deep look at Skibidi Toilet, there is a wiki about it, so no worries. Also here is a nitpick: the Skibidi Toilet article is attracting a bunch of vandalism, and I have seen various episodes list articles be protected against vandalism, an article being a list of Skibidi Toilet episodes could be a giant vandalism magnet, especially since that article is not a good one anyways. I do not think that articles should be deleted simply because they attract vandalism, but this one is a laughing stock. CarlFilip19 (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NLIST. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 13:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non notable The Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^(hedgehogs) 15:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delte: the episodes are literally just "skibidi toilet 12" "skibidi toilet 50." What is the point of just having skibidi toilet then many numbers listed out. Most of the episodes aren't even a minute long. It feels very unnecessary, and very unnotable. TomMasterReal^TALK 02:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.