Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sanya episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sanya episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of episodes of a non-notable TV show. The show itself would fail WP:GNG. Both articles, this fork and main article, are unreferenced for verifiability as well as notability. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the series is not notable, then a list of its episodes certainly shouldn't exist here. But either the TV series should have been nominated first at AFD or together in this AFD with this list, because without a judgment on that series' notability it can't really be used as a deletion rationale here. Maybe add the series to this discussion and then relist to ensure sufficient time for its consideration? postdlf (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TVSHOW says any serial aired on National Television is notable. (That actually covers almost all. I don't know why the clause is so loose one.) So the show is notable enough to stay. If the show is put through Afd, it would most likely fail under WP:GNG. But a separate list of episodes is just too much to have. Hence i didnt nominate the main article. (There are many such i have nominated recently.)§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 08:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 00:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 4. Snotbot t • c » 04:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – non-verifiable, fancruft, fails notability guidelines, and last nail is original research as titles are the imagination of some user. — Bill william compton^Talk 14:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
merge into the main article, summarizing perhaps a little further but still saying what actually happens, not giving a teaser. Both the episode summaries and the main article need some considerable rewriting to eliminate unsourced opinion. I don't see the basis for sayign the show itself is not notable: it's a major channel production, I thing. DGG ( talk ) 08:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.