Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kya Mast Hai Life episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kya Mast Hai Life episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of episodes of a non-notable TV show. The show itself would fail WP:GNG. Article is unreferenced for verifiability as well as notability. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 08:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but WP:PERNOM is not a valid argument for deletion. →B music ian 00:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Of course it is. It's just shorthand for "I have considered the arguments made by the nominator and agree with them." Or are you saying that everyone needs to come up with fresh arguments or they're not permitted to comment? Wouldn't that actually punish nominators who write detailed and complete deletion rationales? Reyk _YO! 22:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 00:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I agree with the nomination. I also argue that list articles generally must satisfy our requirements for reliable secondary sources; episode lists, character lists and other bumf related to works of fiction do not inherit notability from the parent work. Finally, I think the episode and season numbers are nonsensical (dozens of seasons since 2009? really?) so much of the content can be challenged on accuracy grounds. Reyk _YO! 22:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.