Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ISKCON devotees by status
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 00:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of ISKCON devotees by status
- List of ISKCON devotees by status (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non-notable list of members. Wikipedia is not a directory. Sfacets 03:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: most list members appear notable, which leads me to believe that the list itself is. -Drdisque 03:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: There is a catagory for ISKCON, having a list as well, though adds slightly more detail with the person's status, isn't required. Also, ISKCON has over 100,000 members - Being a list of "ISKCON devotees by status" it certainly could get very long. Chopper Dave 03:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename to List of notable ISKCON devotees. I hope there isn't another list that isn't by status out there, but we only need one. --Dhartung | Talk 07:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge notable members to ISKCON Sfacets 10:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The article seems against the basic aims of Wikipedia - I can't see that it suits any purpose more than a simple category list would. Ys, Gouranga(UK) 20:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep An organized list of notable members in a relgious succession. If a list of bishops can get in, so can this. DGG 06:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per original nom. WMMartin 17:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.