Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Global Force Wrestling personnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Global Force Wrestling personnel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See the Wikiproject. GFW was a very hyped wrestling promotion. However, one year after the roster was revealed, the promotion is a very small promotion. The source, GFW website is outdated. Many of the wrestlers listed in the website signed with other promotions and leaft GFW (Karl Anderson, Doc Gallows, The Young Bucks, Sanada, Watanabe...) Also, if you take a look at GFW event, a few wrestlers appear in the roster. GWF hasnn't a regular roster, so this article is unnecesary. Also, I propose also Template:Global Force Wrestling personnel HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my comments at the above linked project discussion. GFW is just another tiny Indy promotion, nothing major at all. Also agree with deleting the template, as it is unneeded. oknazevad (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it should be kept along with the template because they are bound for network television or even Netflix they are attempting to find a deal to broadcast GFW things take time deleting everything now would be for nothing when GFW finally hits TV everything will have to be recreated I'll agree the roster page on their website is way out of date but that doesn't mean the promotion won't grow the same way TNA grew it takes time JMichael22 (talk) 15:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- As Feedback said, That's Crystal Ball. Since 2014, Jeff Jarrett is looking for a TV deal. Right now, they don't have one nor a regular roster. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete JMichael's argument boils down to crystal-balling and nothing more. If GFW gets a TV deal and they end up having a definitive roster that appears on TV on a regular basis and is notable for its own article, then by all means, we should create the article. Until then, we don't even have the faintest clue what GFW's roster looks like because the promotion doesn't have substantial coverage and our only recourse is an out-dated primary source. This is not merely a question of notability, I'm not convinced a definitive roster even exists. Feedback 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lots of WP:SYN and WP:CRYSTAL going on here. Borders on WP:HOAX as it seems a regular GFW roster does not exist.LM2000 (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Feedback and LM2000. Plus, the minute secondary sourcing in the article shows lack of notability. starship.paint ~ KO 00:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All GFW has currently are regulars who are apart of their tours/Live events and co-promotion shows like Aldis, Dutt, Von Eerie, Bollywood Boyz, Myers, Kongo Kong, Colt Cabana, Mickie James and Jarrett JMichael22 (talk) 17:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as everything seems to suggest this wrestling group is questionable and there's also nothing to suggest a convincing separate article. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough significant coverage for this article to meet GNG. Pretty much every source is a primary one. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 22:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.