Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Glamorgan first-class cricket records
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- List of Glamorgan first-class cricket records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete after comparison with the club records section in Glamorgan County Cricket Club. This list is a subset of information already held to better advantage in the club article and, by itself, it fails WP:NOTSTATS and WP:NOTMIRROR. Jack | talk page 14:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant JMWt (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. This was evidently found trawling through Category:Cricket-related lists, but it was in the wrong category - it should have been in Category:Lists of English cricket records and statistics. And a quick perusal of that category indicates that many counties have lists of records - e.g. List of Hampshire CCC first-class cricket records. StAnselm (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- You're right and I will request withdrawal of the AfD. Thanks for spotting and correcting the categorisation error. Jack | talk page 07:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nom per StAnselm's actions above. Article should be keep. Jack | talk page 07:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - if it's to be kept then the section on the County page needs to have a main template on it and redirect with a prose section to this article. I'll get on to that later if no one else has done it already - that will avoid the redundancy issue. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.