Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Disney references in Enchanted (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Disney references in Enchanted (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page does not contribute much encyclopedia value. The vast majority of it is either original research or mere trivia, neither of which should be presented on Wikipedia. The Enchanted article itself already discusses the noteworthy information regarding the references. My initial thought is to Delete the page, but as always, I leave it up to the community. TNstingray (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Frankly, the author of the article would be better to go and add this content to the appropriate TV Tropes article - but not here on Wikipedia. Feels like it falls afoul of WP:PLOT. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • DISCLOSURE: added to my !vote to further flesh out my thoughts. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disney and Lists. Shellwood (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:PLOT is generous. This is essentially one big WP:TRIVIA section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3mi1y (talk • contribs) 07:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- So much WP:OR, the entire article is essentially WP:TRIVIA. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As mentioned in the nom, the main Enchanted (film) article already includes a sourced, prose section discussing the film's ample use of homages. This spinout is nothing but a list of trivia that goes against the manual of style. The majority of the items included are also unsourced, and seem to be largely comprised of WP:OR. Rorshacma (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just a big WP:TRIVIA collection. This would be better on the Fandom Wiki for Enchanted. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.