Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Crusader enemies
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of Crusader enemies
- List of Crusader enemies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable list of video game enemies. Does not meet WP:GNG because there are no reliable third party sources to verify any of this article's contents. Existing sources are all official guides, and thus non-independent, and cannot meet the GNG's requirements. Also violates the WP:VGSCOPE guideline that these kinds of lists are generally unnecessary to provide a WP:CONCISEPLOT of the game, and thus violate what Wikipedia is WP:NOT. Randomran (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia isn't a game guide, and this is simply game cruft at best. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete — even though there are sources (albeit none of them are cited, so hopefully there are no copyvio issues present), this seems to be WP:INDISCRIMINATE. MuZemike (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarification -- there are sources, but they're not independent, and do not meet the requirements of WP:PROVEIT or WP:GNG. All four are official information that has been commissioned by the game publisher. Randomran (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - inappropriate article per WP:VGSCOPE. No assertion of notability via significant coverage in sources independent of the topic. Content is WP:NOT#GUIDE material. sephiroth bcr (converse) 10:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.