Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chapo Trap House episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (withdrawn informally although never completed by the nominator) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chapo Trap House episodes

List of Chapo Trap House episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A separate Wikipedia article listing the episodes of Chapo Trap House? Chapo Trap House barely meets the notability requirements. A list of episodes for this podcast surely doesn't? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is some precedent for similar articles, here: episode category. I believe the article should be kept.--MainlyTwelve (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Snooganssnoogans, hope you're well. I don't see a reason for deletion given in your nomination statement. I do understand your opinion that you don't wish a separate list. In my view, Chapo Trap House seems notable enough and including the list within that article would editorially elongate the article beyond requirement. Per WP:LISTN, "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability". However, the list of Chapo Trap episodes itself seems notable as various episodes have been discussed in Medium, Paste magazine (check the material before the interview), Washington Post and others. As per WP:LISTN again, "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been." I personally feel this qualifies on LISTN and should be a Keep, both for informational purposes and for pure notability reasons. What do you think? Warmly, Lourdes 03:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unfamiliar with Wikipedia policy when it comes to lists, so I'll heed the advice of more knowledgable users. There does seem to be a precedent for listing episodes for podcasts if the podcasts themselves cross the threshold of notability. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Snooganssnoogans. You could leave a note at the top of this Afd that you are withdrawing the nomination. Warmly again, Lourdes 03:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.