Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Category 6 Atlantic hurricanes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Category 6 Atlantic hurricanes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had originally thought this could redirect to List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes, but upon second thought, I think it should just be deleted. I think it's unplausable that people are actually going to type out "List of Category 6 Atlantic Hurricanes" in the URL, and any other links to this page on other pages were introduced by the author. I see no need for a redirect. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:OR, agree it's an implausible redirect. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 07:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 13:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is completely false. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, entirely WP:OR based on a hypothetical addition to the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale proposed by the media (a wonderful source of useless nonsense). Albeit created in good intention, this article has no place on Wikipedia. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Cyclonebiskit. -- 202.124.72.222 (talk) 11:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, OR, no sourcing. --Golbez (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball Delete Obviously nobody wants it. I was just trying to expand the coverage of the subject. Whatever. --Bowser the Storm Tracker ^{Chat Me Up} 12:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no subject to cover here. "Category 6" does not exist, except in disaster films. There is no defense for it, so don't put the blame on us for not wanting it. --Golbez (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per this, I'm tagging it for speedy deletion under G7. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.