Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Big Brother Canada (season 4). (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no content on the page that is not already on the Big Brother Canada (season 4) page. Having equivalent pages for previous seasons is not reason enough for this one to have it, especially as no one has actually added any substantial content to it for a week. Katanin (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Music1201 ^talk 03:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the main article. There seem to be some nicknames included on the candidate for deletion which could be added to the main page. Other than that, I think just redirecting it after salvaging the little usable content would work. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the main article for now. No prejudice against recreation if and when there's something substantive (and reliably sourceable) to say — while permissible once there's some actual substance to it, a page like this does not need to exist as a placeholder in advance of there actually being content for it. Bearcat (talk) 02:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect these don't need separate articles, and there's already a list in the season's article. Peter James (talk) 23:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.