Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. Australia has never had a resident ambassador to Norway. Article contains mostly primary sources . The few third party sources like Canberra Times merely contain routine coverage which confirm the role . Arguments like WP:MUSTBESOURCES, WP:ADHOM do not add to notability LibStar (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So the office was first held concurrently by the ambassadors to Sweden and now the ones to Denmark? Would this merit a merge of some sort? The two separate articles to merge to makes it a lot harder. It seems to be a Wikipedia standard to have an ambassador list of every little country to every little other country: List of ambassadors of Sweden to Ukraine. However I do prefer it this way, as the information is hard to find otherwise. The Wikipedia templates make research of ambassadors a lot easier. They're also simple, clean lists: quickly glanced through. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment; I don't see why deletion would be appropriate or even advisable. Lists are meant to make research easier. Any technicalities can be explained in a short paragraph at the top. As Magoo aptly mentioned, these lists are widespread, and they are so for a reason. I don't see a merge target for this one in particular. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

maybe due to the fact that Australia has never had a resident ambassador, if we start making lists of non resident ambassadors in wikipedia we'd have tens of thousands of lists of very quesitonable value. LibStar (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.