Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Asian Australian communities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Asian Australian communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is entirely unencyclopedic. There are "Asian" communities in every suburb of Australia, but this article has no criteria for exclusion or inclusion. It also has no obvious purpose.--Grahame (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Grahame (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No criteria for inclusion on this list. WWGB (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose or Merge I believe this article needs a change in name such as to "List of cities and regions with large Asian Australian communities" and should focus on major communities as the article already does. I also believe that if it is going to be deleted the article should then be merged into Asian Australians. List of U.S. communities with Asian-American majority populations, List of U.S. cities with large Hispanic populations and List of U.S. communities with Native American majority populations exist, so why can't this? (58.164.98.231 (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

— 58.164.98.231 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. — I am 58.164.98.231 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I am a dynamic IP user and have made many edits in regards to this topic however, based on the IP I used to publish my stance on the issue, it appears to be that I have not. I have been told that the previous note on IP address needs to appear here for clarity.

I don't think there's anything to merge, since there's nothing reliably sourced here. Also, I note that List of U.S. communities with Asian-American majority populations has been tagged for notability for six years! That's the problem with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. St Anselm (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, List of U.S. communities with Asian-American majority populations has a clear inclusion criterion: 50% Asian-American per census data. St Anselm (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. If such a list as mentioned above is possible, this is not it. None of the references suggest any particular location has a "large" Asian community; the best they do is indicate "above average". E.g. Ultimo, New South Wales has 17.6% Chinese-born. That seems high, certainly above average, but the source doesn't indicate it's a "major Asian community". Do we work on percentages? If so, what is the cut-off? 10%? 20%? 50%? 80%? This list doesn't tell us. St Anselm (talk) 02:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@StAnselm: Okay I understand what you're saying but really "none of the sources" so I'm assuming you have read the entire book, Christmas Island: An Anthropological Study? (58.164.98.231 (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Delete, largely per StAnselm. I'll also point out the fact that Sunnybank, Queensland (which admittedly is only 15.1% Chinese-born and 7.1% Taiwan-born, per its article) isn't listed, despite it being "the new Chinatown" according to a great many Brisbane foodie types, to say nothing of Chinatown, Brisbane being only a precinct of Fortitude Valley, Queensland (only 2.2% Chinese-born). And so on. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete no criteria for inclusion as others have said plus bordering on original research. So the whole city of Darwin is an Asian community? LibStar (talk) 03:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOR Power~enwiki (talk) 04:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Asian Australians. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

as discussed above the content inclusion is questionable , so merging something that is disputed is not an option in my opinion. LibStar (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.