Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2018 Indian Premier League Half-Centuries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 22:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of 2018 Indian Premier League Half-Centuries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominator's rationale: WP:NOSTATS. Matthew_hk t c 18:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Matthew_hk t c 18:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Matthew_hk t c 18:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For more context, half-centuries seem did not have a separate article from Century (cricket) and a rough inspection in Cricket records and statistics, did not have any list of half-centuries. Matthew_hk t c 18:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTSTATS. Ajf773 (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:NOTSTATS, no indication as to why this list is significant or notable. Spike 'em (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not encyclopedic. Johnlp (talk) 20:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is suitable for Wikipedia, Because it has some useful information about the Indian premier league Half-Centuries. So kindly request this article should not be deleted.I will improve this article please give me some time (Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

@Mr.Mani Raj Paul:. Wikipedia is not a webhost of everything. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that had some criteria for the entry. Please see WP:GNG, WP:OR and WP:NOSTATS. Matthew_hk t c 09:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is good article because when someone Search on Google List of 2018 Indian Premier League Half-Centuries

It will directly show the information of knowledge graph.

Half-Century is a unique article in Wikipedia. & Also in a past 10 years this article not be created.but in 2018 I want this article of IPL Half-Century.so kindly request to you this article should not be deleted please (Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

@Mr.Mani Raj Paul:, as a new user, i suggested you to read the policy of wikipedia. Matthew_hk t c 10:00, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read any of the guidelines quoted? You thinking this is a good page is not enough. As per the above, Wikipedia is not a repository of random sliced and diced stats pages. Could you please provide a source for the overall list, as it otherwise counts as Original Research which is also not allowed. Spike 'em (talk) 10:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I read all the Guidelines of Wikipedia, I update this article daily List of 2018 Indian Premier League Half-Centuries.I also Provided the source, so I kindly request to you please do not delete this article (Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 09:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

If you've read the guidelines, what are your views on WP:IINFO and how does this article relate to it? Spike 'em (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read guideline of Wikipedia, but I did a lots of hard work for List of 2018 Indian Premier League Half-Centuries , If this article is deleted then I feel sad, This is a sports article, please help me what I do now , please approve my article please please.... Help me... (Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Unfortuately, amount of time spent creating content is irrelevant in deletion discussions. This article suffers from a combination of not being notable WP:N, being original research WP:OR, and being collection of overly detailed statistics WP:NOTSTATS. You need to show that this article fits within these guidelines rather than appealing for sympathy. Spike 'em (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all the above. Scoring a half-century isn't that unique and certainly does not warrant an article on them for the IPL. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - scoring a century is fairly notable, scoring 50 is not. There is no way that a list of the 50s in one competition in one season is encyclopedic -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete if this article was about list of double centuries I would have kept the article. Half century is not notable enough. Also this fails WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:STATS. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 08:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.