Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquipel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liquipel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability criteria laid out at WP:ORGCRIT specifically the in-depth coverage required, not just a few industry trade rag mentions or nn awards. The only thing coming close to coverage in a big-name RS is the Popular Science "gadgets award" (the one labeled LA Times is actually their blog platform) and that's not sufficient to sustain an article. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing comes close to WP:ORGCRIT. In fact, even Popular Science award isn't close to ORGCRIT. It may be a good company, but the references do not add up to notability for Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 01:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.
Delete - per nomination - MA Javadi (talk) 21:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination context.Abtehas98 (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.