Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid DrumStep
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Liquid DrumStep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CSD declined, doesn't fall under "band". There is a obvious WP:COI here, and no third-party sources included. No relevant google searches found. Self-promo, non-notable term. — Timneu22 · talk 13:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable genre with no references or mentions on Google apart from the article itself. TeapotgeorgeTalk 15:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete major COI/Self promotion; not to mention the complete lack of third party reliable sources and therefore notability. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced, not notable, COI, self-promotional. 71.77.20.119 (talk) 03:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.