Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Vallejo
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 00:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Linda Vallejo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:Artist. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article needs a lot of work, but she has become notable. She has 2 pieces in the LACMA plus 3 other museums.[1] I found several references which I've placed temporarily in the external sources section. [2] & [3] University of CA Library,[4] LA Weekly,[5] Museum of the Southwest,[6] Artweek LA.--Nixie9✉ 14:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 13:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Appear to be plenty of sources for a substantial article.FigureArtist (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.