Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Fargo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep based on sources brought forward in discussion. RL0919 (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Fargo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the news is about a movie where her character is portrayed and really the sources fails to establish what she is notable for. Wikipedia is not a Linkedin of business executives, it very clearly fails to establish what she is notable. If you are an executive of a company, it doesn't makes you notable, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 21:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scatter My Ashes at Bergdorf's is a documentary that features her, not a movie where she is portrayed as a character. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 21:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not really anything about her outside documentary. WP:ONEEVENT. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep and rework as subject is clearly notable, but the article is severly lacking. See the following articles about her in TIME, Forbes, Harper's Bazaar, Galerie Magazine, The New York Times, Observer, Business of Fashion, Wall Street Journal, Racked, Interview Magazine, and W Magazine for starters. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and rework per the reliable sources that @Willthacheerleader18: has uncovered. Royalbroil 02:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per the sources shown by Willthacheerleader18, she meets WP:BASIC. Some of the coverage is lengthy, some is short, but those still contribute to notability, as "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, per developments. --Doncram (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.