Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limey (band) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Limey (band)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Limey (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NBAND#C5 with two albums on RCA, so notability is presumed, and thus we need verifiability. We have sufficient WP:verifiability via AllMusic to keep a stub. This includes including some stuff that can be incorporated into the article, such as the fact that B.J. Cole appeared on an album [1][2] and the fact that Jim Rodford and Bob Henrit appeared on one album [3].
- Given that this was pre-digital era it's quite likely that a good bit more will be verifiable as sources are discovered to expand the article. —siroχo 06:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I've expanded the article and added a few sources. Album releases and coverage are sufficient for notability. There was coverage during the time of the band's existence, although it will be in print sources, so some of it may be hard to find. --Michig (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as there is enough reliable sources coverage for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Pre-internet press may be hard to find, but meets wikipedia keep criteria by having multiple releases on a major label, although they don't appear to have been particularly successful or noteworthy. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.