Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian Lim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lillian Lim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no notable judge--normally we include only state judges of the highest level, not trial court�s DGG ( talk ) 15:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete city and county level judges need a lot more sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trial court judge at the US state level. Does not meet our standards for inclusion. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.