Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Like Light to the Flies
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Ascendancy (album). Clear consensus that this song lacks sufficient coverage to warrant an individual page. (non-admin closure) Gong show 08:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Like Light to the Flies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSONGS; there appears to be so significant coverage of the song to warrant a stand-alone article. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 14:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 20. Snotbot t • c » 16:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNo significant coverage. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Rather, redirect to album. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Ascendancy (album), song doesn't seem to be notable enough on its own merits. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to a proper page. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.