Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Andrew Wright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Andrew Wright

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note - this person is linked to Banter Media and Ex Cathedra (film) and is named on those two pages (which I will also AfD)

This page gives seemingly impressionable/notable feats however on a deeper trawl the majority of the accomplishments listed on this page are either unreferences or first hand sources. The majority of the references link to this persons twitter page, cryptoslate (to which he is affiliated), bantermedia (to which he is affiliated) or youtube - there are no reliable sources here; reference no6 appears to be a promotional news article.

The Ex Cathedra film linked to this person (to which he is director) has no sources that I have been able to find that show its notability and the only reference shows that it appears to be more of a university project than an actual released film. Fails GNG with non reliable independent sources and 0 coverage,   Kadzi   (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Kadzi   (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but this page has been live since 2010 and now you feel it should be deleted after you declined the CryptoSlate article? Sorry but this feels like an attack on crypto from a reviewer who is failing to be neutral. You can watch Ex Cathedra on Amazon Video right now -https://www.amazon.com/Ex-Cathedra-Richard-Massara/dp/B09HJC8FCY - several sources are from 2009-2010 before WayBackMachine was as good as it is today and thus some references got lost in time.

This was by no means a University project and had no association with any educational establishment. The film is listed on IMDB https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1172052/ and has been since is launch at Santa Barbarra International Film festival in 2009. 0xCryptoDegen (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. QuietHere (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I am the individual in question so my vote probably won't be counted but my arguments are listed above regardless. 0xCryptoDegen (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - evidently self-promotion. Deb (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with all above, many refs but not much substantive coverage. Crypto position is neither here nor there. Oaktree b (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.