Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardo Rocco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shouldn't have never been relisted with a strong deletion nomination like that and no keep comments Secret ^account 05:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo Rocco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a hairdresser to celebs that, in keeping with earlier creations by User:Misty2010 and User:Misty2011 (see also the current AfD/Kike San Martín [2nd nom]) bulges grotesquely with promotional flatus. Sample: Rocco recognizes that his passion, enthusiasm, energy, commitment and strong work ethic have allowed him to capture the attention of perfectionists and this is reflected in his celebrity clientele. His clients seek him when making a change to their image and the driven stylist that attains his inspiration from film, people on the street, shows, and other professionals, manages to consistently satisfy the exquisite tastes of those that request his services. Conceivably, Rocco merits an article. (The sources adduced are in Spanish and PR-aromatic English. I don't pretend to understand the former [or trust Google Translate], but take a dim view of the latter, one of which reads in its entirety: The eighth annual Miami Hair, Beauty & Fashion 2012 By Rocco Donna event showcased the latest hairstyles, makeup looks, and clothing designs with a celebrity fashion show and VIP party at the spa at Viceroy on November 8, 2012.) Let's suppose for a moment that Rocco does merit an article. Then the current article is not at all promising as a starting point. It would be less work to start afresh than to start with this -- if there's something that merits writing up, of course. Hoary (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is doubtful but this article is so full of peacock terms and advertising, that it is better to apply some TNT The Banner talk 11:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Automatic Strikeout (T • C • AAPT) 02:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.