Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard J. Cerullo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. The single argument that the subject is not notable has been countered by evidence that he is. Michig (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard J. Cerullo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no external references Rathfelder (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability requirements for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep He may pass WP:GNG with sources like [1] and [2].--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 10:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probable Keep: ~34 pages in book Vital Signs by the author of the Tribune article above, which also appears to have been adapted by Readers Digest[3]. "Pioneered the use of lasers in neurosurgery and noninvasive methods for various primary and metastatic brain tumors"[4]. President of the ASLMS from 93-94[5], which had given him an award in 1987[6], "...for their accomplishments in either the research or clinical field, based on their lifetime contribution to laser technology". Mentions in book reviews at [7] and [8]. Society of Neurological Surgeons bio is at [9]. NACADEMIC criteria requires expert assessment, as it appears he may have claims against a few of them. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the large number of sources with a high reputation and easy significant coverage found in Vital Signs by sources independent of himself, thus qualifying for our general notability standards. Also, AfD is not cleanup, that being in reference to the nominator's statement. J 947 ^{^{^{(c · m)}}} 21:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.