Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Daw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leila Daw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find significant coverage for this artist. fetchcomms☛ 02:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I cleaned up the article a bit. I think there's enough coverage in reliable published sources to pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein's improvements. My only quibble is whether she was actually a Professor in the UK sense, which would automatically confer notability, or the US sense, which I think just means a teacher at a University.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ARTIST #3: "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." -- Radagast3 (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per multiple sources added by David Eppstein.[1] Great work. Ty 03:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.