Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leiki

Leiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:CORP and WP:SOAPBOX. WP:DEL4 is a very close call considering the tone of this article and WP:COI. I tried to find reliable and independent sources for this article, but all of them struggle to cope with WP:CORPDEPTH or are not independently reported. Saying this makes me retch, but the best source was this one in which the CEO proudly states how he used Wikipedia for advertising to get into USA (WP:SOAPBOX and WP:COI). The awards received are typical third-rate startup company awards and do not prove notability. This page has been recreated after being speedily deleted back in 2009, and has somehow survived for years. Ceosad (talk) 15:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and WP:TNT at best as the Finnish Wiki has some sources although I'm not familiar with any of them but again there's not much convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.