Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Gill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leigh Gill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Even his own IMDb entry is very sparse and unsurpisingly searches reveal nothing additional. Appears to be a small part actor that few reliable sources have talked about. Probably too soon for this actor but certainly fails WP:GNG at present Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The article itself is unsourced but a search has turned up some sources for this actor, plus a considerable amount of discussion/criticism of the way his character is depicted in Joker, and even theories that he could factor into a future sequel. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. — Hunter Kahn 12:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: He has a supporting role in Joker (2019 film), and starring roles in a few non-notable productions. With a few more sources included, I think the article could remain. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with same reasons already listed by Dflaw4 and Hunter Kahn above. — al-Shimoni (talk) 07:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.