Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego: The Adventures of Clutch Powers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 19:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lego: The Adventures of Clutch Powers

Lego: The Adventures of Clutch Powers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. No sources for information. Only source is Rotten Tomatoes, which records zero critic reviews. A mention in Clutch Powers should be sufficient for this film. LukeSurl ^{t c} 10:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  10:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep per meeting WP:NF. For this article, its topic notability is established through multiple sources being available even if not (yet) used. ie: DVD Talk, DVD Verdict, Cinemagazine (Dutch), Out Now (German), Moviemuser (UK), Commonsense Media, and others. And sorry LukeSurl, while Rotten Tomatoes is not perfect, it being the only source currently used does not mean the topic non-notable or not improvable. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per analysis and sources above. Cavarrone 17:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.