Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Dawon

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SF9. As Sam Sailor said, redirects are cheap. (non-admin closure) J947 05:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for this article:
Lee Dawon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A case of WP:TOOSOON (to add: Individual members of SF9, with the exception of Kang_Chan-hee, are NOT notable enough to have their own articles as their activities are exclusively within the group SF9 and nowhere else.) Tibbydibby (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative search terms:
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 20:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 20:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 20:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.